Language Change- Linguistics
Par Plum05 • 21 Novembre 2018 • 4 048 Mots (17 Pages) • 559 Vues
...
double comparison
She’s more beautifuller than you are.
He’s my bestest friend
He’s the most roughest.
adjective forms for adverbs
He ran slow.
Come quick! (also colloquial standard English)
unmarked plurals
a hundred pound
five foot
place prepositions:
I was at London.
He went up the park.
- revival of the "mandative" subjunctive, probably inspired by formal US usage
We demand that she take part in the meeting.
– elimination of shall as a future marker in the first person
– - development of new, auxiliary-like uses of certain lexical verbs (e.g. get,
want ,
e.g., The way you look, you wanna / want to see a doctor soon.
- increase in the number and types of multi-word verbs (phrasal verbs,
have/take/give a ride, etc.)
- placement of frequency adverbs before auxiliary verbs (even if no
emphasis is intended
I never have said so
demise of the inflected form whom
- increasing use of less instead of fewer with countable nouns
e.g. less people
- spread of the s-genitive to non-human nouns
e.g. the book’s cover
- "singular" they
e.g. Everybody came in their car.
Bauer:
- a tendency towards analytical comparatives and superlatives (politer
more polite) ?
- empirical picture isn’t that clear
- towards end of 20th century: with –y-words + -le-words more
synthetic, with –ly wo
rds more analytic
- i.e. the change brings about a differentiation in processes,
"regularisation of a confused situation”
- my bad
- be like
- meister
- bot, from robot, knowbot, mobot (mobile devices)
- centric
cyber, cyberspace cyberpunk
e- e-café, e-zine, etc.
-ist , ageist, sizeist
tele, telebanking, telemarketing
- Über, überbabes, über-TV-show
- ware: software, freeware, charityware, etc.
SYNTAX
Middle English Grammar
- loss of inflections 11th and 12th centuries, so it started well before the
influence of the Norman Conquest,
- the grammar system took a few hundred years to reorganize itself, until the
last part of Middle English
reasons:
1. Viking settlements: contact situation led to a pidgin-like or Creole English
with fewer endings and more reliance on word-order; this may have spread
from the north-east to the East Midlands where Standard English later came
from
2. difficult to hear the difference between endings if the first syllable is mostly
stressed + weakening of unstressed final pre-consonantal vowels
- with loss of inflections word order became central
- change from synthetic to analytic grammar
- French invasion and retreat: removal of language authority as a condition for
change
Negation
- early texts: ’ne’ (no/na) was placed before the negated verb: I ne can ne I ne
may (I do not know how to nor am I able to)
- ’ne’ was often reinforced by ’nought’ (nought/nothing), ’nought’ developed
into ’not’: Ne reche I nought (I don’t care)
- double or triple negation was common: ne hadden nan more to gyuen (they
had no more to give); for nan ne was o the land (there was none in the land)
- extra negative words made negation stronger, emphasis
- ne dropped out in the 14th century, but remains for emphasis in some nonstandard
dialect
– not then follows the verb: I know not you
Word Order
SVO typical,
but: still forms like wenten they (still to be found in the 19th century), when the
subject was short
Nouns
loss of declension= declinazione, except a few forms: genitive and a few remnants of dative
endings, for Gode, on honde, in lande
- because of inflection (declension) loss: more prepositions
OE: tham scipum (datives) Middle English: to the shippes
Mutated Plurals: - change of stem vowel: man – men, fot – fet, gos – ges
– broþer – breþer + additional
...